New Page: The Void Sprocket

20 06 2009

I want to draw everybody’s attention to a new feature here at Vacuum Genesis.  Check out The Void Sprocket both at the top of this page, and in the right sidebar.

The Void Sprocket is basically a resource guide for speculative poets.  I may expand it into an actual speculative poetry market in the future, but for now I just want to keep it simple and useful.

There is a bit of a story behind the image that I have chosen to associate with this project (shown left, or above, depending on how WordPress chooses to crunch it all).  I put it together using an old family photograph and some rather inept editing with Photoshop Elements.  It was intended to be the cover of my self-published speculative poetry collection titled–obviously–The Void Sprocket.  That project fell apart, so I have recycled the idea (and associated image) for the purposes of my little on line web-zine.

I hope that my fellow speculative poets find The Void Sprocket to be a useful and interesting resource.  Bookmark my Vacuum Genesis  blog and check back often.





Giza Is Coming!

3 06 2009

Just a reminder.  My poem “Giza” is due out in Star*Line sometime this summer, so keep your eyes peeled for that.

Related.  I see where fellow speculative poet and on-line acquaintance Rose Lemburg has a poem in the current issue of Star*Line…”Burns at Both Ends.”  She also has a poem nominated for this year’s Rhysling Award.  Go Rose!

Related to that…I finally found the issue of Star*Line that proves one of my poems was once almost nominated for a Rhysling.  You see, when I found out that Rose’s poem had been nominated I was so thoroughly pissed off, jealous, and seething with indignation happy about it that I remembered when I almost once received that honor.

I don’t have the thing right in front of me, but it was a 1988 issue of Star*Line in which a list of Rhysling Award nominees was presented (prior to the balloting, obviously).  At any rate, I can remember to this day getting that issue in the mail and my eyes popping out to see that my Poem “Sound and the Electric Ear Dream” (Amazing Stories, Nov. 1987) was on the list.  Woo Hoo!

Then I saw the asterisk.  Turns out it wasn’t actually nominated…it was somebody’s second choice.  I don’t think they take “second choices” now, and I’m not sure why they did then since the “second choice” wasn’t included in the anthology, but it was still kinda nice to know that it was somebody’s second favorite speculative poem that year.  I can live with that.

Anyway.  I have a poem due out in Astropoetica.  Not sure when.  “The Strange Attractor.”  I’m really proud of that put because I REALLY love that specpo outlet.  Click the link and check them out.  Good stuff.





On Speculative Poetry

20 07 2008

I’ve said it before, here I am saying it again.  There are about as many definitions of “speculative poetry” as there are people who read and write it.  I’ve been writing speculative poetry for over twenty years, even managing to publish some of my work now and again, so it follows that I am going to bring a certain amount of bias to the discussion.

But before I get all biased, I would like to create a framework to house my discussion.  Above all else, when I talk about speculative poetry I am referring to a specific genre of poetry that appears to have first gained popularity (if I may be so bold) some time during the early to mid 1970’s, around the time that Suzette Haden Elgin founded the Science Fiction Poetry Association (link is currently not working).  It is true–and I’ve had this pointed out to me several times–that a great deal of Edgar Allen Poe’s work could legitimately be called speculative.  Some of what I’ve read by E. E. Cummings and Emily Dickinson qualifies.  If I cared to, I could find speculative aspects of Robert Frost’s “After Apple Picking.”  In much the same way that all fiction can be considered “fantasy,” all poetry has some speculative element in it.  But for the purpose of my discussion, speculative poetry is a genre of poetry that, at least in it’s early stages, was very closely linked with science fiction’s ”new wave” movement of the sixties and early seventies.

What is speculative poetry?  How is it different than any other type of poetry?  These are the questions that I am asked most often, as regards this subject.  It would be easiest to simply say that it is science fiction poetry, and leave it at that.  But that would throw the burden of definition back on the person asking the question, depending on his or her knowledge of what science fiction is.  It’s a definition that really only speaks to people who read science fiction.  When I began writing this stuff back in the late seventies, I thought of it as science fiction poetry.  I often heard it referred to as science fiction poetry.  I don’t think the term “speculative,” as applied to the type of poetry that I was writing, even occurred to me until I saw it on the cover of an issue of Mark Rich and Roger Dutcher’s The Magazine of Speculative Poetry.

So before I start running my mouth about it, let’s see what some other people in the field have to say.  In an interview that I did with Elissa Malcohn, former editor of Star*Line, Ms. Malcohn begins from what I would consider to be a “fragmented” definition, in that she has moved away from the science fiction poetry definition and regards “speculative poetry” as several different poetry genres: science fiction, fantasy, horror, and science.  She goes on to say that: “Such poetry often uses metaphors to engage the imagination and go beyond everyday reality. Even writing about the world around us, but using language other than what one might expect, can create a speculative poem.”

In his guidelines for submission to The Magazine of Speculative Poetry, Roger Dutcher says: What is most important to remember is that speculative poetry is a species of imaginative literature, and that it is a new species. Each poem in part defines the field as it is written.

All of these quotes, and any of a dozen similar that I could add, point us in the right direction, but they still leave us grasping, in my opinion.  It is the very nature of this genre to want to be as inclusive as possible, so it is rare that you will find someone willing to make a more definitive statement.  And for good reason.  It would be incredibly arrogant for any one of us in the speculative poetry realm to stand up and claim that we have “defined” the genre, and that others must now adhere to our definition.

So, what I’ve done is come up with my own definition of speculative poetry, for my own use, and apropos of nothing beyond that.  You may accept this definition as written, expand upon it, or ignore it completely.  For me, in order for a poem to be considered speculative, it must do two things:

  • The poem must inspire a sense of awe and/or wonder
  • The poem must portray or posit some fantastical element…either of science, or myth, or the supernatural realm, and this fantastical element should be contrasted with reality as the reader understands, or perceives it

For me, this is what I believe that speculative poetry–be it science, SF, horror, or fantasy–must accomplish in order to distinguish itself from mainstream poetry.

Further reading:

About Science Fiction Poetry, Suzette Haden Elgin

Speculative Poetry: A Symposium, Part 1 of 2, By Mike Allen, Alan DeNiro, Theodora Goss, and Matthew Cheney (ed.)

Speculative Poetry: A Symposium, Part 2 of 2, By Mike Allen, Alan DeNiro, Theodora Goss, and Matthew Cheney (ed.)

Bruce Boston, Writing Speculative Poetry: An Interview with Bruce Boston, by John Amen





Minimalist Poetry

6 07 2008

Somebody started a discussion about minimalism in poetry over at the AW message board.  I read through the links that somebody provided, and after about twenty minutes not only did I have an expert’s grasp of the subject, but was in fact qualified to write my own minimalist poem, and add it to the body of minimalistically poetical work that is already out there.

By the way, if anyone is writing a wiki article on this subject, please be sure to mention me, and my minimalist poem, as I am now probably the foremosttalented writer of this kind of thing.  In fact, you can link right to this post, which should save you a lot of unnecessary thinking and typing and so on.

So, here’s my minimalist poem, entitled Decisions…

poorpprorcon?

I think the first thing that you will immediately notice is how deeply layered the poem is, for all of it’s obvious sparsity.  Before reading further, spend some time in this masterpiece…let it foam up around you, as it were…and see how many different layers of meaning–all related to the concept of Decisions–that you can find on your own.

As we deconstruct this poem, keep the title–Decisions–in mind.

Upon our initial examination, our eyes are drawn immediately to the poem’s first, or primary, layer of meaning: POOR ORC ON?  Why is the orc poor?  What is the orc on?  I don’t know.  That’s your decision…

Deeper, more thoughtful reading of the poem begins to reveal greater mysteries, though.  For example, when you read it slowly and thoughtfully, you are suddenly confronted with POO OR PP PRO OR CON?  Do you need to poo, or pee pee?  Are you for or against either of those things, or anything else in particular?  Why are some people PROfessionals, while others are CONvicts?  I guess these are more decisions that we will have to make, aren’t they?

Finally–and perhaps most telling as to the poet’s intent–if you back a few more feet away from the computer screen and read this marvelous work, it sort of looks like I was trying to type the word POPCORN while having a sneezing fit.

That must mean something…

I leave it for you to decide.